Version 1.0. This page describes how the editorial content Euro Intermed publishes — blog articles, guides and analyses — is produced, and who answers for it. It exists for two reasons that ask for the same thing: the transparency obligation in Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, which recognises a documented editorial process as an alternative to labelling AI-generated text, and the ordinary practice of a publication that wants to be believed.
1. Who takes editorial responsibility
Editorial responsibility for all content published on this site and on the ecosystem sites rests with EURO INTERMED SOLUTIONS S.R.L., VAT RO39132147, trade register J8/735/2018, seated in Brașov, as the designated legal person.
Articles are published under the company’s name rather than an individual byline. This is a deliberate choice: our content describes our own commercial practice — how an ex-warehouse price is calculated, what a minimum order quantity means, how a customs clearance runs — and that knowledge belongs to the team rather than to one person. When we publish material that rests on a particular person’s expertise, we will sign it with their name.
2. Who writes, who checks, who approves
| Stage | Who | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Drafting | The commercial and operations team | The subject starts from a question a client or supplier actually asked |
| Verification | A second person on the team, not the author | Facts, figures, sources, quotations and legal points are checked |
| Approval | The person responsible for editorial | Without approval the article does not reach the “published” state |
Nothing publishes itself. The platform refuses by construction to publish an article whose review state is not approved — this is not an internal convention, it is a rule the system enforces.
3. What gets checked
- Figures: prices, quantities, lead times, percentages, dates. Every figure has a source, ours or external.
- External sources: cited and linked, so you can check them yourself.
- Legal and tax statements: written as general information with a reference to the applicable text, never as advice.
- Dates: the publication date and the last-updated date are real and visible on the article.
4. What AI tools do here
We use artificial-intelligence tools for research and structuring — to gather context, propose an outline, and tidy phrasing. We do not use them to generate and publish unsupervised text.
The distinction that matters, and that Article 50 draws explicitly: a grammar pass is not human review. Substantive review means a person confirmed the facts, filled in what was missing, and took ownership of the result. That is what the process above describes.
If we ever publish an article generated automatically without that review, it will carry a visible label saying exactly that. See also the AI usage policy.
5. What we do not publish
- Content on sensitive subjects — health, financial, legal — produced through a fully automated pipeline.
- Commercial recommendations presented as independent analysis.
- Figures we cannot stand behind with a source.
6. Independence from the commercial side
Our articles describe the market we work in, so they plainly relate to what we sell. The rule we hold to is simple: an article never says anything about the market that we would not say to a client on the phone. Where an article recommends one of our services, it says so openly.
7. Corrections
When we get something wrong we correct the article and update the date. Substantive corrections — a wrong figure, an inaccurate claim — are noted in the article rather than quietly removed. Report anything to contact@euro-intermed.com.
8. Archive and traceability
The publishing system keeps the revision history: who wrote, who reviewed, when, and what changed. That record is the evidence this policy rests on.